Calories Burned Running uphill at 85 kg — 833 kcal per Hour
Running uphill at 85 kg (187 lb) burns about 833 kcal per hour. That figure comes from the activity's MET value of 9.8 in the 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities, multiplied by body weight: 9.8 x 85 kg x 1 hour = 833 kcal. This page works the numbers out in full - for 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 minutes, across all four weight bands, and against four comparable activities at the same weight - so you can plan sessions with real figures instead of guessing.
Running uphill means running against gravity: every step lifts your whole body weight a little higher, and that extra work is what makes hill running so demanding. The Compendium has no exact entry for running uphill, so the closest published value is used: running at 6 mph at 9.8 METs. In practice the real cost depends on the gradient — a gentle slope costs a little more than flat running, while a steep hill can cost far more — so treat 9.8 METs as a typical hill-running effort, not a precise measurement of your hill.
Running uphill suits runners building leg strength, trail racers, and anyone who wants a hard workout in a short time. The headline number to remember is 833 kcal per hour at 85 kg, or about 417 kcal for a 30-minute session. Everything below is an estimate: MET values are population averages, and your own burn will vary with fitness, running economy and the steepness of your hill. Treat the figures as a planning tool, not a personal measurement.
Calculate your own numbers
Use the running calorie calculator to work out your own burn for running uphill at your exact weight and session length. Enter your weight, pick the activity and set the duration, and the tool applies the same MET formula shown below. You can also try the calorie calculator to see how this session fits into your total daily energy use, and the pace calculator for exact times at any speed.
Related pages in this section:
The formula, shown and cited
The standard way to estimate the energy cost of an activity is the MET formula from the Compendium of Physical Activities (Ainsworth et al., Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2011; 43(8): 1575-1581):
Calories (kcal) = MET x body weight (kg) x duration (hours)
One MET is the energy you use sitting quietly at rest - about 1 kcal per kilogram of body weight per hour. An activity rated at 9.8 METs therefore uses 9.8 times as much energy as resting. The Compendium's MET values come from published studies that measured oxygen use during each activity, so they are measured averages, not guesses. The value used here, 9.8, is the one recorded for running uphill in the FitCalc activity data.
Note: the Compendium has no exact entry for running uphill; the closest published value is used, unchanged: running, 6 mph (9.8).
Worked through for this page:
- MET for running uphill: 9.8
- Body weight: 85 kg (the midpoint of the 80-90 kg band, 187 lb)
- Duration: 1 hour
- Calculation: 9.8 x 85 x 1 = 833 kcal
For a 30-minute session the same calculation is 9.8 x 85 x 0.5 = 417 kcal. Nothing else is hidden in the maths - if your weight or duration changes, only those two numbers change.
Your numbers at 85 kg
| Duration | Calculation | Calories burned |
|---|---|---|
| 15 minutes | 9.8 x 85 x 0.25 | 208 kcal |
| 30 minutes | 9.8 x 85 x 0.5 | 417 kcal |
| 45 minutes | 9.8 x 85 x 0.75 | 625 kcal |
| 60 minutes | 9.8 x 85 x 1 | 833 kcal |
| 90 minutes | 9.8 x 85 x 1.5 | 1250 kcal |
That is about 13.9 kcal per minute of running uphill at this weight. A short session still counts: even 15 minutes burns 208 kcal, and three 15-minute sessions across a day add up to the same 625 kcal as one 45-minute session.
How the burn changes with body weight
The MET value stays the same - it describes the activity, not the person - but the calorie total scales with weight, because a heavier body costs more energy to move:
| Body weight | Calories per hour | Calories per 30 minutes |
|---|---|---|
| 55 kg | 539 kcal | 270 kcal |
| 65 kg | 637 kcal | 318 kcal |
| 75 kg | 735 kcal | 368 kcal |
| 85 kg | 833 kcal | 417 kcal |
Two people doing the same activity for the same time can therefore burn quite different amounts, and that is expected - it is physics, not a mistake in the formula. If your weight sits between two rows, your figure sits between the two values.
How running uphill compares
Here is running uphill against four other activities at the same 85 kg, all using the same MET formula:
| Activity | MET | Calories per hour at 85 kg |
|---|---|---|
| running uphill | 9.8 | 833 kcal |
| running at 6 mph | 9.8 | 833 kcal |
| running at 7 mph | 11 | 935 kcal |
| hiking with a backpack | 7.3 | 620 kcal |
| climbing stairs | 8.8 | 748 kcal |
Use this table to choose, not to judge. A higher number means a harder session, not a better one: the activity you enjoy and repeat three times a week beats the activity that burns more per hour but that you quit after a fortnight. Mixing intensities across the week - one harder session, two easier ones - is usually more sustainable than doing the hardest activity every time.
Fitting running uphill into your week
| Sessions per week | 30 minutes each | 60 minutes each |
|---|---|---|
| 2 sessions | 834 kcal | 1666 kcal |
| 3 sessions | 1251 kcal | 2499 kcal |
| 5 sessions | 2085 kcal | 4165 kcal |
At 9.8 METs, running uphill is vigorous-intensity activity, so it counts double toward the widely used adult activity target: 75 minutes of vigorous activity a week is the equivalent of 150 minutes of moderate activity. Two 30-minute hill sessions a week already give you 60 vigorous minutes and burn about 834 kcal a week at 85 kg. One hill session a week is enough for most runners: hills build strength quickly, but they also load the calves, Achilles and knees, so they need recovery time.
How to use the result
Run hills by effort, not by pace: your speed will drop on the climb, and that is expected. Lean into the hill slightly from the ankles, not the waist, shorten your stride, and drive your arms. Use hill repeats — for example 6 x 60 seconds uphill with a slow jog back down — rather than a long continuous climb when you are starting out. Walk the steepest parts if you need to; the effort still counts. Take the downhill slowly and with short steps, because downhill running loads the knees and quads hard. Warm up with ten minutes of easy flat running first, and cool down afterwards. If you are tracking food as well, add the session's calories to your total daily energy expenditure for that day, and remember that the figure is an estimate with roughly 10-20% uncertainty. Do not eat back every calorie the calculator shows. If you are aiming to lose weight, keep the deficit modest - 300-500 kcal a day is a common, sustainable range - and keep your total intake above the safety floors of 1,200 kcal a day for women and 1,500 kcal a day for men unless a healthcare professional advises otherwise.
What the number does NOT tell you
The MET figure used here is the closest published Compendium value — running at 6 mph at 9.8 METs — because the Compendium has no exact uphill entry, and the real cost of hill running depends on the gradient in a way no single number can capture. A gentle 2% slope and a steep 10% climb are different workouts, and the formula cannot tell which one you ran. It does not account for wind, heat, altitude or the surface underfoot, it does not account for your running economy or body composition, and it does not include the afterburn that follows hard sessions. It also cannot tell you whether hill running is safe for you: if you have a heart condition, joint problems, asthma or any other health concern, check with a healthcare professional before starting intense running. Use the calorie figure as a planning estimate.
Frequently asked questions
How many calories do I burn running uphill for 30 minutes at 85 kg?
About 417 kcal. The maths is 9.8 METs x 85 kg x 0.5 hours = 417 kcal. That is an estimate using the closest Compendium value — running at 6 mph at 9.8 METs — because there is no exact uphill entry, and a steeper hill will cost more.
Does running uphill burn more calories than running on flat ground?
Yes, at the same speed — gravity adds work with every step. That is also why your pace drops on a climb: you are doing more work per step, so you take fewer steps per minute. Running by effort rather than by pace is the right approach on hills.
How steep does a hill need to be to count as uphill running?
Any noticeable gradient counts. Even a gentle 2-3% slope raises the effort, and a 5-10% climb is a serious workout. You do not need a mountain: a park hill, a road incline or a treadmill set to a gradient all work, and short repeats on a moderate hill are more useful than one long grind up a very steep one.
Is running uphill bad for your knees?
Uphill running itself is usually kinder to the knees than downhill running, because the impact is lower — but it loads the calves and Achilles tendon hard, and the downhill return is where knees take the strain. Build up gradually, take descents slowly with short steps, and stop if you feel sharp pain.
Can running uphill help with weight loss?
It can help, but only as part of an overall calorie deficit. At 85 kg, an hour burns about 833 kcal, which is a strong contribution — but weight loss still comes from the total balance of food and activity across the week, not from one run. Aim for a gradual loss of 0.5-1% of body weight per week, and never drop below 1,200 kcal a day (women) or 1,500 kcal a day (men) without medical supervision.
Estimates only, not medical advice. Minimum safe intakes: 1,200 kcal/day women, 1,500 kcal/day men - consult a healthcare professional before a very-low-calorie diet.